|
|
Go to page [Previous] 1~2 | ||||||||||
Chris Becker Veteran user New York, NY 371 Posts |
If I don't have a pack of cards with me, I can often use business cards. For reformations of course, but also - simply marking the cards on their back - for things like twisting the aces. So card moves can be transferred to other objects indeed.
Looks impromptu ... but isn't! Heh, heh! Best, Chris
- - -
<BR>Cards don't cheat people. People cheat people. |
|||||||||
TylerErickson New user St. Paul, Minnesota 50 Posts |
As I was contemplating the "Elmsley count as concealment for secret attachment" conundrum, it occurred to me that I AM aware of something that has utilized a card count for just such a thing.
Paul Harris's "Ultimate Rip-off". In this routine a card is apparently ripped into four pieces, then 3/4 restored. The "Pieces" are displayed with a count that is (in essence) the E-Y-E count. The specific function of the count? To conceal a secretly joined condition. To me, the purpose of this thread is about seeing connections, and (hopefully) inspiring those who might normally think, "That blankity-blank move has NO connection to this blankity-blank move." If it served its function for anyone, I am ecstatic. (I know I have learned something!) Later my friends, Tyler Quote:
Along with Sid, I'm wondering how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. I once saw some Hell's Angels stomping on a guy who looked like Zippy the Pinhead. if this counts the answer is five. |