On 2011-10-03 22:32, Woland wrote:

I think there is a difference for advocating that America's enemies, who daily conduct violent acts of war against us, be killed, and suggesting that bankers -for the mere fact that they have more money than she has- be sent to re-education camps or beheaded. Advocating beheading Muslims just for being Muslims would also be something other than what Ann Coulter appears to have said. Sorry that you can't see it.

On 2011-10-03 15:03, gdw wrote:
Is this part of her support of "occupy wall street?"

That whole movement may bring about great change, or terrible change.

11-8-18


Send to Penza
To Comrades Kuraev,
Bosh, Minkin and
other Penza
communists

Comrades! The revolt by the five kulak volost's must be suppressed
without mercy. The interest of the entire revolution demands this,
because we have now before us our final decisive battle "with the
kulaks." We need to set an example.

1) You need to hang (hang without fail, so that the public
sees) at least 100 notorious kulaks, the rich, and the
bloodsuckers.
2) Publish their names.
3) Take away all of their grain.
4) Execute the hostages - in accordance with yesterday's
telegram.

This needs to be accomplished in such a way, that people for
hundreds of miles around will see, tremble, know and scream out:
let's choke and strangle those blood-sucking kulaks.

Telegraph us acknowledging receipt and execution of this.

Yours, Lenin

On 2011-10-03 15:51, rockwall wrote:
I wouldn't assume that because Roseanne Barr thinks she is a comedianne, that she is trying to be funny here. She is seriously wacked. If you ever read her regular blog, you will find things that will make your eyes bleed. When she says someone should be be-headed, my first inclination is to think she means it way before I consider that she might be trying to be satirical.

On 2011-10-03 23:45, rockwall wrote:
Not that I want to defend Glenn Beck but I've listened to the clip. He's obviously joking and being sarcastic. Now whether you think jokes like that can actually be humourous may be another thing.

If you want to see a nice collection of real civility, take a visit to this link.

http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/10/the......00-2010/

On 2011-10-04 11:09, Andrew Musgrave wrote:

So... if Roseanne Barr, who's at least known for being a comedian, makes a comment about bringing out the guillotine for unnamed bankers, we shouldn't assume she is joking... but if Glenn Beck, who's only known for political punditry, makes a comment that names Michael Moore specifically and talks about a fantasy of choking the life out of him, he's "obviously joking and being sarcastic"?

On 2011-10-03 15:51, rockwall wrote:
I wouldn't assume that because Roseanne Barr thinks she is a comedianne, that she is trying to be funny here. She is seriously wacked. If you ever read her regular blog, you will find things that will make your eyes bleed. When she says someone should be be-headed, my first inclination is to think she means it way before I consider that she might be trying to be satirical.

On 2011-10-04 11:38, LobowolfXXX wrote:

Quote:

On 2011-10-04 11:09, Andrew Musgrave wrote:

Quote:

On 2011-10-03 15:51, rockwall wrote:
I wouldn't assume that because Roseanne Barr thinks she is a comedianne, that she is trying to be funny here. She is seriously wacked. If you ever read her regular blog, you will find things that will make your eyes bleed. When she says someone should be be-headed, my first inclination is to think she means it way before I consider that she might be trying to be satirical.

The bankers/Moore thing is a poor analogy, because would be revenge, and the other would be a public service.

For those who can't tell, I'm not advocating anything...it's just a bad joke!

On 2011-10-04 12:03, Dannydoyle wrote:
Coulter says things to sell books. This should not really be in dispute. Rush and Hannity say things to get viewers, listeners. This also should not be in dispute. Rosanne is just trying to stay relevant.

Perhaps, and this is just me, we should be a bit more concerned with those who actually have a say in policy? Keep getting bogged down in what you hate about others and nothing ever gets fixed.

On 2011-10-03 21:53, Kevin Connolly wrote:
But Drone strikes on Americans are OK?

Glad you agree.

On 2011-10-04 12:03, Dannydoyle wrote:
Coulter says things to sell books. This should not really be in dispute. Rush and Hannity say things to get viewers, listeners. This also should not be in dispute. Rosanne is just trying to stay relevant.

Perhaps, and this is just me, we should be a bit more concerned with those who actually have a say in policy? Keep getting bogged down in what you hate about others and nothing ever gets fixed.