|
|
stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 998 Posts |
Over 2.5 trillion decimal places!
pi news |
TomasB Inner circle Sweden 1144 Posts |
I'd like to see them printed out.
I feel the urge to write the word memorize for no obvious reason. /Tomas |
landmark Inner circle within a triangle 5194 Posts |
Measure twice, cut once I always say.
Click here to get Gerald Deutsch's Perverse Magic: The First Sixteen Years
All proceeds to Open Heart Magic charity. |
R.S. Regular user CT one day I'll have 192 Posts |
That's a lot of pi!
Ron
"It is error only, and not truth, that shrinks from inquiry." Thomas Paine
|
airship Inner circle In my day, I have driven 1594 Posts |
Shucks. The previous record was 1.2 trillion digits. I had that down pat. Now I'm going to have to learn 1.3 trillion more!
'The central secret of conjuring is a manipulation of interest.' - Henry Hay
|
Nir Dahan Inner circle Munich, Germany 1390 Posts |
I am still not worried - they are still as far as before from the last digit...
|
Picard_1114 New user New York 76 Posts |
How does one calculate π?
|
Thomas Henry Inner circle Minnesota 1467 Posts |
I would drop needles on a tiled surface unless time was important to me.
Thomas Henry |
Nir Dahan Inner circle Munich, Germany 1390 Posts |
Quote:
On 2009-08-22 00:44, Thomas Henry wrote: only a Buffo(o)n would do something like that... |
Scott Cram Inner circle 2678 Posts |
True. Real men calculate pi with frozen hot dogs.
|
Thomas Henry Inner circle Minnesota 1467 Posts |
Well! I've never been so offended in my life! I never would have thought my virility would be questioned on the Café, especially since I've never mentioned my book (ahem)...oops, I just did...
But I suppose we should offer some sort of serious response to Picard's original question. Buffon's needle approach will indeed offer up an approximation to Pi, but it converges extremely slowly and really isn't practical if you want a ton of digits in a reasonable amount of time. A more accessible approach would be that of Archimedes. Inscribe and circumscribe polygons with a circle. These perimeters are easy to compute since they are rectilinear. Thus, one can trap the circumference of a circle within two bounds, and then Pi shakes out from this and the diameter. What's nice is that it only takes some geometry. Or one could use a Taylor polynomial (a standard topic from Calculus II) which is perhaps more amenable to computer programs. But in the final analysis (great pun, eh?) these computer results you hear about computing approximations to a bazillion places are using all sorts of tricks to speed up the convergence. It's part of a field known as numerical analysis. So, Picard, it's not easy to answer your question briefly, but in a nutshell there are approaches using modeling, geometry, calculus and more advanced numerical analysis. The main difference among them is the efficiency of the computations. Thomas Henry |
Beaulieu New user 57 Posts |
I keep wondering how they know pi goes on forever without repeating if we haven't gotten to the end!
~Ben
"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out" ~Bertrand Russell
|
WilburrUK Veteran user 389 Posts |
Quote:
On 2009-08-27 12:16, Beaulieu wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_that_%CF%80_is_irrational can be a bit hairy to follow if you're not into trigonometry or calculus. |
Irfaan Kahan Veteran user 346 Posts |
Which will cause your spectators to pass out from boredom sooner; 8 perfect Faro shuffles in a row or reciting the digits of pi to 2.5 trillion decimals??
(I say the faro shuffles . . .)
I'm a Magician playing the part of an Actor
|
stanalger Special user St. Louis, MO 998 Posts |
If one could recite 5 digits per second, it would take over 15,000 years to recite 2.5 trillion decimal digits of pi.
|
landmark Inner circle within a triangle 5194 Posts |
I'd still take that over Sam the Bellhop.
Click here to get Gerald Deutsch's Perverse Magic: The First Sixteen Years
All proceeds to Open Heart Magic charity. |
magicFreak2 Inner circle 1220 Posts |
Quote:
On 2009-08-19 13:54, airship wrote: Hahahahaha |