|
|
Lester![]() Regular user Scotland. U.K 193 Posts ![]() |
Hi Everyone,
I've always performed 20th Century Silks using a method outlined in a very old Harry Stanley Catalogue! Does this date me, or what! I've never really been happy with it given that it involves a quite bulky load of silks ending up looking quite creased at the end of the effect. Consequently, I've tended to use this trick at the start or opening of the programme in order to overcome this problem. It would be good to be able to do at any time during the show, in any conditions using an angle free prop. Can anyone out there in the Café suggest a simple, cheap prop that I can build which will enable me to perform this lovely, little effect to its best advantage. As always, my thanks to you all. Lester |
rtgreen![]() Inner circle Portland, Oregon 1322 Posts ![]() |
Is the Harry Stanley method the standard method?
Thanks, Richard |
hugmagic Inner circle 7674 Posts ![]() |
Pm me and tell what you have doing as the method and maybe I can advise you how to handle this better.
Richard
Richard E. Hughes, Hughes Magic Inc., 352 N. Prospect St., Ravenna, OH 44266 (330)296-4023
www.hughesmagic.com email-hugmagic@raex.com Write direct as I will be turning off my PM's. |
Ron Reid![]() Inner circle Phoenix, Arizona 2733 Posts ![]() |
Hi Lester:
I'm not familiar with the Harry Stanley method, but the typical method from Rice's Encyclopedia of Silk Magic will give you the result you're looking for. The silk which appears between the other two is never folded up in a small bundle, making creases, etc. I've been doing the 20th Century Silks for years, and have always done it in the middle of the program - the silk looks just fine. Ron |
Spellbinder![]() Inner circle The Holy City of East Orange, NJ 6438 Posts ![]() |
Don't get "proppy" with a silk trick. Sure, you can make a wooden stand to do the trick, but the beauty of it is that you can also do it with 4 ungimmicked silks and that's to be preferred over a prop trick any day.
Professor Spellbinder
Professor Emeritus at the Turkey Buzzard Academy of Magik, Witchcraft and Wizardry http://www.magicnook.com Publisher of The Wizards' Journals |
David Bilan![]() Special user Clarksville, TN 714 Posts ![]() |
The version I started out with thirty years ago doesn't fold or crush the silks except when you stuff them into a glass, spectator's hands or a dye box. The final display always looked good.
Not sure what method you are using, but several involve rolling the silk(s), leaving no wrinkles.
Yes, I am a magician. No I did not make my hare (hair) disappear... it just took early retirement.
|
hugmagic Inner circle 7674 Posts ![]() |
I agree with the guys about crushing the silks. If you use pure silk, there is no problem.
I just am not familar with the Harry Stanely method but have used the prepared and unprepared methods with no problems. Richard
Richard E. Hughes, Hughes Magic Inc., 352 N. Prospect St., Ravenna, OH 44266 (330)296-4023
www.hughesmagic.com email-hugmagic@raex.com Write direct as I will be turning off my PM's. |
Lester![]() Regular user Scotland. U.K 193 Posts ![]() |
Hi Everyone,
Thanks guys for your replies. I shall look around for alternative methods which do not involve rolling the silks! As always, all good magical wishes. Thanks for your help. |